TEA PARTY MAIN STREET FORUM - Mitt Romney, about the man to be president

TEA PARTY MAIN STREET FORUM
[image]

« Mitt Romney, about the man to be president »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 21, 2013, 1:45am

TEA PARTY MAIN STREET FORUM :: OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS :: Republican Party :: Mitt Romney, about the man to be president

Author

Topic: Mitt Romney, about the man to be president (Read 772 times)

Hat In Ring
Administrator

member is offline

[avatar]

A Positive Voice Of Reality In The World Of Politics

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
Location: Up, Down, All Around

Mitt Romney, about the man to be president
« Thread Started on Jul 16, 2012, 2:09am »

MITT ROMNEY & PAUL RYAN ARE THE NEW FACE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
Putting the old GOP ways to rest.
It's No Longer Trickle Down Money, It's Now Trickle Up For U.S. Citizens

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, End Trickle Down and Start "Trickle Up For U.S. Citizens".

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan The New Face Of The GOP

The New Republican Party Concentrating On A Balanced Approach Between Businesses Creating Jobs & U.S. Citizens Finding Pathways To Those Jobs Through Skill Enhancement and Information Resources

Mitt Romney Paul Ryan The New Face Of The GOP

Mitt Romney was the Governor of Massachusetts in 2002 in a "Democratic" state. Yes, a republican was elected in Massachusetts because democratic elected officials couldn't make any improvements in the state because "liberalism" just doesn't work. Mitt Romney was a conservative and that's what the state needed so the democratic population either stayed home or voted for Romney. More than likely the democrats just stayed home and let Romney get elected.

The democrats of the state wanted the so called Romney care. The state legislature was controlled by democratic elected officials in a democratic state. Romney was a republican in a democratic liberal state that wanted government run health care. No different than Arnold Schwarzenegger in California. California is a democratic state and things just can't get done because again, "Liberalism by democrats" doesn't work. Now California has a democratic governor and the states failing faster with a democratic governor than with a republican governor. Romney went through the same B.S. in Massachusetts, "the democrats just wouldn't let the proper fixes happen but at least Romney got some positive things done.

It has never been mentioned in the news why Romney signed the government health care in Massachusetts but I bet yah Romney cut a deal with the democrats and got some of his bills passed in exchange for signing "Romney Care". This is the way it is with a democratic controlled congress. A republican governor can't get anything done unless he/she signs into law some god forsaken mess the democrats want.

Other than the Romney Care in Massachusetts I haven't heard anything else that would lead me to beleive that Romney supports any kind of liberal idology. The business man Bloomberg who became mayor of New York city is a super liberal. Bloomberg knows his numbers but watch out, Bloomberg supports liberal social issues that drag the morals of a city down then tries to correct the moral downfall of the city by creating anti fat laws and other "You Act And Do This Way" laws to control thought. Mitt Romney isn't anything like mayor Bloomberg of New York or the old school republican party.

Romney needs to attract the student and womens vote. The spanish vote can't be gotten because they are Obama supporters looking specifically to get amnesty for their friends and family members they bring into the U.S. illegally. The hispanics that vote for Obama like the welfare and freebies also and depend on it due to the fact they like large families and start producing children long before they have a good enough income to support a large family. The hispanics that do vote for Mitt Romney are the hispanics in the U.S. that don't want the horrible Obama type governments in their countries of orgin. The black vote is lost to Obama automatically. The republicans do get a small amount of the black vote that have gotten with the program so to speak. Romney also needs to win the Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul supporters usually support free and open borders letting foreigners come and go as they please but they hate Obama and his communist thought more so Romney should do well with Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul supporters are hell bent on voting for Gary Johnson now that Ron Paul is backing off this election but know if Obama gets elected again the libertarian party will suffer right along with republicans. Libertarians are more concerned about themselves over the welfare of the U.S. sometimes with their open borders thought and their dislike of alot of the laws that protect U.S. citizens.

As for issues Mitt Romney supports that's clear with his choice of Paul Ryan as VP. Paul Ryan oversees the governments budget in congress and Mitt Romney picking Paul Ryan as his running mate tells the whole story of Mitt Romneys plan to restore the U.S. as a country that will lead and take care of U.S. citizens first.

Mitt Romney wants to be the face of the new energized republican party and not part of the established GOP that didn't take care of business. The old established GOP didn't cause the 2008 economic mess as the democrats would have people beleive but they didn't push hard enough against a democratic congress that did cause the 2008 economic mess to get the changes installed that would have avoided the collaspe. President Bush did try to pass bills in congress to repair Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac but the democrats rejected these changes and in 2008 millions of people lost their homes and became improverished.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan will lead U.S. citizens into a fresh era of republican responsibility to U.S. citizens promoting new pathways to financial freedom for all and a balanced approach between U.S. citizen financial health and businesses creating jobs that support U.S. citizens way of life.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are very concerned about issues concerning single women and graduating college students. Both groups are fighting to create their income sources either as new entries into the work force or single women that can't find the financial path that will support them through an education program and get them educated enough to become a force in the work place that doesn't have to rely on government assistance.

Mitt Romney just announced in a few campaign ads he is running that a federal skills program will be created to help U.S. citizens that are having trouble getting trained or advancing their skills due to rising financial costs in the public and private educational systems. Support of individuals through the educational period with housing, food and misc. costs is a problem that will be addressed so the vast potential labor force of graduting college students and single women can be a great source for employers to utilize.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan want to be the new face of the republican party that addresses the needs of U.S. citizens seeking to find that path to financial freedom in the private sector. All U.S. citizens and not just the chosen few from one political party or private sector group. Giving all U.S. citizens male or female an equal footing in the private sector and creating a variety of paths to gain a reasonable income that will support each individual is the new republican goal.

A smaller compact government that is built to be completely efficient in dealing with its financial and private sector issues will free up billions of dollars that can be spent on creating resouces that U.S. citizens can us to find that pathway to financial freedom either through skills training or information resouces. U.S. citizens that want a "True" hand up and not a welfare system hand out will be able to find it here in Mitt Romneys skill program. People looking for a hand out will still be able to find that in the states welfare system.

As for the tax code, that has to be updated without a doubt. Any democratic messages stating that Mitt Romneys tax plan will eliminate popular tax deductions that middle class and low income wage earners use is "Not True". Some loop holes will be closed that high income earners use to increase their profit margins. The basic overall tax codes may be updated so they are more efficient and less confusing but the popular deductions the middle class uses will be kept intact without any new taxes put upon them. The democrats will say because of the tax cuts being given to businesses the republicans will have to impose new taxes on the middle class to make up for those new income tax cuts on businesses but this statement by the democrats is a blunt lie. Tax cuts to businesses means more jobs will be created that will flood the U.S. treasury with billions of dollars more than doing it the democratic way of raising taxes on the wealthy. Tax cuts on businesses will generate 1000 times the revenue than taxing the wealthy due to increased job creation and U.S. citizens gaining income sources though greater access to earning from jobs.

Dealing with the income gap between the top 1% and the bottom 99% is another story that's easy to change though adjusting trade with China, lowering taxes on businesses to bring back jobs to the U.S. and putting restrictions on the immigration that's flooding the U.S. market with cheap labor. Taking care of these three issues will start the turn around decreasing that income gap.

Romney for president, rah rah rah, he better get it right!

Mitt Romney

« Last Edit: Sept 24, 2012, 8:50pm by Hat In Ring »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free